Skip to main content

Asertis Ltd -v- Clarkson & ors

Wednesday 9 February 2022

Appeal 1 – The Claimant/Part 20 Defendant, Asertis Ltd, appeals the order of HHJ Hodge, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, dated 10 February 2021, whereby he granted their summary judgment/strike out application in certain respects, but otherwise dismissed it, and reserved the costs of their application to the trial judge.

Appeal 2 – The appellants, the 2nd to 4th and 6th to 8th Defendants (`the MC Defendants’),  appeal the order of HHJ Hodge QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, dated 10 February 2021, whereby he entered judgment against the MC Defendants in the sum of #984,000, made orders regarding the interest on the judgment sums, refused their application to re-amend the Amended Defence and Part 20 Claim and made consequential costs orders.

Appeal 3 – The appellants, Future Resources RZE and 6 others (Part 20 Defendants/Defendants),  appeal the order of HHJ Hodge QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, dated 10 February 2021, whereby he dismissed the Part 20 Defendants’ application for summary judgment/strike out save for in certain respects, refused the Defendants’ application to enforce the Tomlin Order and reserved the costs to the trial judge.

View hearing