<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Courts and Tribunals Judiciary</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.judiciary.uk</provider_url><title>Piepenbrock -v- London School of Economics and Political Science (anonymity order) - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="21Qs6uFm6n"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/piepenbrock-v-london-school-of-economics-and-political-science-anonymity-order/"&gt;Piepenbrock -v- London School of Economics and Political Science (anonymity order)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/piepenbrock-v-london-school-of-economics-and-political-science-anonymity-order/embed/#?secret=21Qs6uFm6n" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Piepenbrock -v- London School of Economics and Political Science (anonymity order)&#x201D; &#x2014; Courts and Tribunals Judiciary" data-secret="21Qs6uFm6n" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Case Reference: CA-2022-002435 In the Court of AppealCivil Division 28 April 2023 Before:Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Warby Between:Dr Theodore Piepenbrock-v-London School of Economics and Political Science Anonymity Order ORDER made by the Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Warby On consideration of the application for an order that the anonymity granted to the ninth defendant in the [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
