<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Courts and Tribunals Judiciary</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.judiciary.uk</provider_url><title>Linear Investments Ltd (claimant/appellant) v Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd (defendant/respondent) - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="ac7WwTqPIz"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.judiciary.uk/live-hearings/linear-investments-ltd-claimant-appellant-v-financial-ombudsman-service-ltd-defendant-respondent/"&gt;Linear Investments Ltd (claimant/appellant) v Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd (defendant/respondent)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.judiciary.uk/live-hearings/linear-investments-ltd-claimant-appellant-v-financial-ombudsman-service-ltd-defendant-respondent/embed/#?secret=ac7WwTqPIz" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Linear Investments Ltd (claimant/appellant) v Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd (defendant/respondent)&#x201D; &#x2014; Courts and Tribunals Judiciary" data-secret="ac7WwTqPIz" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Tuesday 15 July 2025 The Appellant, Linear, brought a judicial review challenge of a decision made by the Respondent in response to a complaint made by the the interested party about the Appellant. The complaint against Linear was upheld by the Ombudsman in its decision of 29 April 2022. Linear was ordered to compensate the [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
