<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Courts and Tribunals Judiciary</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.judiciary.uk</provider_url><title>MH (appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (respondent) - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="e9043vjOvo"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.judiciary.uk/live-hearings/mh-appellant-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-respondent/"&gt;MH (appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (respondent)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.judiciary.uk/live-hearings/mh-appellant-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-respondent/embed/#?secret=e9043vjOvo" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;MH (appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (respondent)&#x201D; &#x2014; Courts and Tribunals Judiciary" data-secret="e9043vjOvo" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Wednesday 7 May 2025 By Appellant&#x2019;s Notice filed on the 28 August 2024, this is an appeal against the decision of the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) promulgated on 19th June 2024 in respect of second refusal of protection claim. An earlier appeal was dismissed by the First Tier Tribunal in January 2018 and [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
