<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Courts and Tribunals Judiciary</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.judiciary.uk</provider_url><title>UniCredit Bank AG (claimant/appellant) v RusChemAlliance&#xA0;LLC (defendant/respondent) - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="bNThpWTiNy"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.judiciary.uk/live-hearings/unicredit-bank-ag-claimant-appellant-v-ruschemalliance-llc-defendant-respondent-2/"&gt;UniCredit Bank AG (claimant/appellant) v RusChemAlliance&#xA0;LLC (defendant/respondent)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.judiciary.uk/live-hearings/unicredit-bank-ag-claimant-appellant-v-ruschemalliance-llc-defendant-respondent-2/embed/#?secret=bNThpWTiNy" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;UniCredit Bank AG (claimant/appellant) v RusChemAlliance&#xA0;LLC (defendant/respondent)&#x201D; &#x2014; Courts and Tribunals Judiciary" data-secret="bNThpWTiNy" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Tuesday 4 February 2025 Application to revoke the final order made in the Court of Appeal, Civil Division dated 29 January 2024 that allowed the appeal. The issue in the appeal was whether the English court had jurisdiction to grant an anti-suit injunction to restrain the pursuit of proceedings in Russia when the parties&#x2019; contract [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
