The Court of Appeal (Civil Division) – Live streaming of court hearings

How and why are court cases being streamed online?

Most cases from the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) are live-streamed on the judiciary’s YouTube channel.
Live-streaming of selected cases began in 2019 to improve public access to, and understanding of, the work of the courts. We are working towards making it possible for all appropriate cases to be live streamed.

View previous cases on the Court of Appeal video archive page.

Tuesday 7 October 2025

Titan Wealth Holdings Ltd & ors (claimants/appellants) v Okunola (defendant/respondent) (external link)

By Appellant’s Notice submitted on 8 November 2024, the claimants below, appeal the decision of Hill J dated 18 October 2024, sitting in the King’s Bench Division, Media and Communications List, dismissing the application for a protective injunction on the basis there was no jurisdiction to make the order.

Tuesday 7 – Wednesday 8 October 2025

Gibson (appellant) v TSE Malta LP (t/a Betfair) (respondent) (external link)

By an Appellant’s Notice, filed on 8 January 2025, the Appellant appeals the Judgment dated 14 November 2024 of HHJ Bird sitting as a High Court Judge in the Commercial Court in which the Judge dismissed the Claimant’s claims and made a costs order in favour of the Defendant.

The dispute relates to the Claimant seeking to recover his gambling losses from the Defendant on the basis they had a duty to prevent his gambling losses.

Tuesday 7 October 2025

Stop Portland Waste Incinerator (claimant/appellant) v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & ors (defendants/respondents) (external link)

By an Appellant’s Notice, filed on 22 April 2025, the Appellant appeal the order, dated 2 April 2025, of Lang J sitting in the Planning Court dismissing the Appellant’s claim for a Planning Statutory Review.

The background to this dispute is an application by the Second Respondent, Powerfuel Portland Limited, for planning permission for the development of an energy recovery facility (waste to power) on the Isle of Portland.

Tuesday 7 October 2025

London Borough of Wandsworth (respondent) v Young (By His Litigation Friend The Official Solicitor) (appellant) (external link)

By appellant’s notice filed on 15 February 2025, the Defendant appeals the judgment of HHJ Saggerson of 27 January 2025 in which he dismissed the Defendant’s appeal against the order of DJ Davey dated 21 September 2023 making a possession order, and allowed the Claimant’s cross-appeal, and made consequential costs orders.

Wednesday 8 October 2025

Haytop Country Park Ltd (appellant) v Amber Valley Borough Council (respondent) (external link)

By Appellant’s Notice filed on 17 February 2025, the Appellant (Respondent below) Haytop Country Park Limited, appeal the decision of Martin Rodger KC, sitting as Deputy President of the Upper Tribunal, judgment being delivered on 22 August 2024.

Haytop Country Park (the Park) is a caravan site near Whatstandwell in the Derwent Valley in Derbyshire. 

The respondent acquired the Park in 2016 and wishes to operate it as a site for permanent residential occupation. In furtherance of that ambition it has carried out substantial engineering work including the felling of trees, extensive ground works to level and reprofile parts of the landscape, and the installation of new concrete plinths for permanent twin-unit park homes.

When the respondent carried out its development it believed that it was entitled to do so without planning permission under permitted development rights – but it was mistaken. The appellant, which is the local planning authority (the Council), served an enforcement notice requiring the removal of the works, and obtained a tree replacement order.

Wednesday 8 October 2025

Adidas AG & ors (appellants) v Thom Browne Inc & ors (respondents) (external link)

By Appellant’s Notice filed on 28 January 2025, the Appellants (Defendants below) adidas AG and others, appeal the decision of Mrs Justice Joanna Smith DBE, sitting as a Judge of the High Court, judgment being delivered on 22 November 2024 following trial.

The Respondents (Claimants below) Thom Browne (“TB”) and others sought to invalidate a portfolio of sixteen of adidas’ registered trademarks, all of which related to “Three Stripes” as position marks. adidas counterclaimed for trademark infringement under sections 10(2) and 10(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, as well as passing off, alleging that Thom Browne’s Four Stripe Design had a high level of similarity with its Three Stripes trademarks.

Wednesday 8 – Thursday 9 October 2025

Notting Hill Genesis (claimant/appellant) v URE Energy Ltd (defendant/respondent) (external link)

By an Appellant’s Notice, filed on 6 November 2024, the Applicant seeks permission to appeal the Judgment dated 14 October 2024 of Mrs Justice Dias sitting as a High Court Judge in the Commercial Court in which the Judge allowed the Claimant’s claim for a contractual termination payment and made a costs order.

Wednesday 8 October 2025

Bellway Homes Ltd (appellant) v The Occupiers Of Samuel Garside House (respondent) (external link)

The Defendant appeals against the order made by Master Dagnall on 13 March 2025. The appeal was transferred to the CA under CPR 52.23 by Sir Stephen Stewart on 26 March 2025.

This appeal raises the following question: if (a) a claimant issues a claim but fails to serve it within the necessary time, (b) they serve it out of time and then apply to court for an order validating the late service, (c) the application is refused, and (d) the defendant is found not to have submitted to the court’s jurisdiction, is the claim at an end or can the court still direct the defendant to acknowledge service and file a defence?

Thursday 9 October 2025

Al-Haq (claimant/appellant) v Secretary of State for Business and Trade (defendant/respondent) (external link)

By an Appellant’s Notice filed on 16 July 2025, the Applicant (Claimant below) Al-Haq, seeks permission to appeal the decision of Lord Justice Males and Mrs Justice Steyn, sitting as Judges of the High Court, dated 7 July 2025, by which they refused permission to bring a judicial review claim.

The Claimant sought judicial review of the Defendant’s decision dated 2 September 2024 which suspended licences authorising the export of items that might be used in carrying out or facilitating Israeli operations in the Gaza conflict as the suspension excluded licences for the export of components for F-35 combat aircrafts which could not be identified as destined for Israel.

Thursday 9 October 2025

Wilson & anr (claimants/appellants) v HB (SWA) Ltd (defendant/respondent) (external link)

By Appellant’s Notice filed on 19 June 2025, the First and Second Claimants appeal against the order made by HHJ Keyser KC (sitting as a Deputy HCJ) dated 30 May 2025 on the Defendant’s application for an order striking out parts of the schedule of loss of the Claimant’s or for summary judgment on those parts.

Thursday 9 October 2025

Mostafa & ors (respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (appellant) (external link)

By an Appellant’s Notice, filed on 1 October 2024, the Secretary of State appeal the decision, dated 3 September 2024 of the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) granting the Respondent’s Judicial Review against a decision of the Entry Clearance Officer refusing an application for entry clearance.

Court 4

Court 63

Court 67

Court 68

Court 69

Court 70

Court 71

Court 72

Court 73

Court 74

Court 75

Court 1 Rolls Building

Court 17 Rolls Building

External links

UK Judiciary YouTube Channel (external link)