Skip to main content

GLF -v- Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust (anonymity order)

Claim No QB-2020-002456

 

In the High Court of Justice
Queen’s Bench Division

23 July 2020

Before:
Master Sullivan
Before:
GLF (A protected party, by her mother and litigation friend DMF)
-v-
Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust


BEFORE Master Sullivan sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice by remote video hearing in private pursuant to PD51Y on 22nd day of July 2020
UPON the Application of the Claimant
AND UPON hearing Counsel for the Claimant and Solicitor for the Defendant
AND UPON consideration of the Claimant’s Article 8 right to respect for private and family life and the Article 10 right to freedom of expression.
AND UPON IT APPEARING that non-disclosure of the identity of the Claimant is necessary in order to protect the interests of the Claimant.
AND PURSUANT to rule 39.2(4) of the Civil Procedure Rules and section II of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 and rules 5.4C and 5.4D of the Civil Procedure Rules.
IT IS ORDERED:-
1. That the identity of the Claimant and of the litigation friend be not disclosed.
2. That the Claimant and the litigation friend be described in all statements of case and other documents to be filed or served in the proceedings and in any judgment or order in the proceedings and in any report of the proceedings by the press or otherwise as “GLF” and “DMF” respectively
3. That the address of the Claimant and of the litigation friend be stated in all statements of case and other documents to be filed or served in the proceedings as the address of the Claimant’s solicitors. 4. That in so far as necessary, any statement of case or other document disclosing the Claimant’s name or address or the name or address of the litigation friend already filed in the proceedings be replaced by a document describing such name or address in anonymised form as above.
5. That the original of any such document disclosing the name or address of the Claimant or of the litigation friend is to be placed on the Court file marked “Confidential, not to be opened without the permission of a Judge, Master or District Judge of the Queen’s Bench Division”.
6. That a non-party may not inspect or obtain a copy of any document on or from the Court file (other than this order duly anonymised as directed) without the permission of a Master or District Judge. Any application for such permission must be made on notice to the Claimant, and the Court will effect service. The file is to be retained by the Court and marked “Anonymised”.
7. That reporting restrictions apply as to the disclosing of any information that may lead to the subsequent identification of the Claimant or litigation friend. The publication of the name and address of the Claimant or of any member of the Claimant’s immediate family [or the name and address of the litigation friend] is prohibited.
8. The provisions of this Order shall not apply:-
a. to communications between the Court of Protection and the anonymised party or Litigation Friend in relation to the payment of money into the Court of Protection for the benefit of the anonymised party or the investment or treatment of payment out of such money;
b. to communications between the Court of Protection and/or the anonymised party or Litigation Friend and any financial institution concerned as to the receipt or investment of such money; or
c. to records kept by the Court of Protection or the anonymised party or Litigation Friend or any such financial institution in relation to such money.
9. Nothing in this order is intended to prevent the Claimant’s family from discussing this case with their family and friends should they wish to do so.
10. That any non-party affected by this Order may apply on notice to all parties to have this Order set aside or varied.
11. A copy of this order shall be published on the website of the Judiciary of England and Wales and in the published copy of the order the Claimant shall be described as GLF and the Litigation Friend as DMF.

Related links

Sign up for alerts

Judgments archive

Judgments published on the judiciary website before 2012 can now be found on The National Archives web archive

Judgment Archive