GLX -v- St George’s University Hospital NHS Foundation Hospital (anonymity order)
Claim number: QB-2011-000162
In the High Court of Justice
King’s Bench Division
23 October 2026
Before:
Christopher Kennedy KC
Between:
GLX (A Child by her Mother & Litigation Friend AGZ)
– v –
St George’s University Hospital NHS Foundation Hospital
Anonymity Order
BEFORE Christopher Kennedy KC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge in the High Court of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL on Friday 23 October 2026
UPON HEARING Robert Glancy KC one of His Majesty’s Counsel, on behalf of the Claimant and Eliot Woolf KC one of His Majesty’s Counsel, on behalf of the Defendant
UPON CONSIDERING the protective nature of the approval jurisdiction pursuant to r.21.10 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998
AND UPON CONSIDERING the Article 8 rights of the Claimant to respect for private and family life and the risk of harm that identification may cause to the Claimant.
AND UPON CONSIDERING the importance of open justice and the Article 10 right to freedom of expression AND UPON THE COURT CONCLUDING that non-disclosure of the Claimant’s identity is necessary to secure the proper administration of justice and in order to protect the Claimant’s interests
AND UPON THE COURT FURTHER CONCLUDING that it is necessary to make a reporting restriction order
IT IS ORDERED that
- The name of the Claimant and the Litigation Friend to be withheld in the statements of case, and in any judgements and orders in this claim, and for those purposes:
(i) The Claimant shall be referred to as GLX;
(ii) The Litigation Friend shall be referred to as AGZ; - The Claimant’s address on the Claim Form shall be substituted by the Claimant’s solicitor’s address.
- No report, whether oral or in writing, or other communication in whatever form (including internet or social media) addressed to the public at large or any section of the public, of or concerning this claim which is published from the date of this order may include;
(a) The name or address or workplace of the Claimant;
(b) The name or address of the Litigation Friend;
(c) Any particulars likely to lead to the identification of the Claimant or Litigation friend’
(d) Any image or likeness of the Claimant or Litigation Friend - Any reports or other communications to the public which exist prior to the date of this order are not affected by this order.
- Pursuant to CPR Rules 5.4C and 5.4D
(i) A person who is not a party to the proceedings may not obtain a copy of a statement of case, judgment or order from the Court records unless the statement of case, judgment or order has been anonymised in accordance with subparagraphs 1 and 2 above.
(ii) If a person who is not party to the proceedings applies (pursuant to CPR r.5.4C(2)) for permission to inspect or obtain a copy of any document or communication, such application shall be on at least 7 days’ notice to the Claimant’s solicitor, trustee or deputy unless the court orders otherwise.
- The Claimant’s solicitor shall file with the Court copies of existing statements of case anonymised in accordance with paragraph 1 and 2 above by 3rd November 2026.
- The court file shall be clearly marked with the words “An anonymity order was made in this case on 23rd October 2026 and any application by a non-party to inspect or obtain a copy document from this file must be dealt with in accordance with the terms of that Order”
- Any interested party, whether or not a party to the proceedings, may apply to the Court to vary or set aside this Order, provided that any such application is made on 7 days’ notice to the Claimant’s solicitor, trustee or deputy.
- This order shall lapse automatically on the death of the Claimant and its provisions shall have no effect from that time.
- Pursuant CPR 39.2(5) a copy of this Order shall be published on the website of the Judiciary of England and Wales (www.judiciary.uk). For that purpose, a court officer will send a copy of the order by email to the Judicial Office.
- The parties are not required to amend or redact any documents other than the statements of case. For example, it is not necessary for medical records to be redacted so as to remove the name and address of the claimant unless a further order is made.
- The Order does not prohibit the following:
(i) Communication using the Claimant’s name between the parties’ appointed representatives and advisers, such as any solicitor, Litigation Friend, attorney, trustee or deputy, or any witnesses or instructed experts.
(ii) Communications between the Court Funds Office and the parties in relation to the payment of money into the Court Funds Office for the benefit of the anonymised party or the investment or treatment of payment out of such money.
(iii) Communications between the Court Funds Office, the anonymised party, and any financial institution concerned as to the receipt or investment of such money.
(iv) Records kept by the Court or the Court Funds Office, the anonymised party, and any financial institution concerned as to the receipt or investment of the Claimant’s money.
(v) Retention by all parties to the claim, their representatives, and their advisers of their unredacted files for the purposes of their continuing functions and obligations in relation to the proceedings.
(vi) Communications between the Defendant(s), their insurers, or their successors in title and their legal and professional advisers, reinsurers, HM Revenue and Customs (or its successor), the Compensation Recovery Unit or any other person required by law.
(vii) Communications between the anonymised party’s representatives and advisers in managing that party’s affairs.
(viii) Communications for the purpose of obtaining medical care, advice or treatment for the anonymised party.
(ix) Communications by or on behalf of a paying party for the purposes of ascertaining whether the anonymised party is alive, so entitled to continuing periodical payments.