Mayflower Primary School -v- London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council (anonymity order)

Administrative CourtHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

Case number: AC-2025-LON-004585

In the High Court of Justice
King’s Bench Division
Administrative Court

In the matter of an application for judicial review

12 June 2026

Before:

David Pittaway KC,
sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge

Between:

The King
on the application of
Mayflower Primary School
(Claimant)

-v-

London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council
(Defendant)

and

IP
(Interested Party)

Order

On an application by the Claimant for permission for judicial review

Following consideration of the documents lodged by the parties

ORDER BY DAVID PITTAWAY KC SITTING AS A DEPUTY HIGH COURT JUDGE

  1. Withdrawal of Claim: The signed draft consent order withdrawing the claim filed by the parties is approved.
  2. Anonymity:

(a) Pursuant to CPR 39.2(4) and/or the Court’s inherent jurisdiction and/or s. 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998:

(i) the Interested Party’s name, and those of her children, are to be withheld from the public and must not be disclosed in any proceedings in public; and

(ii) the Interested Party is to be referred to orally and in writing as IP, Zaid Akraim is to be referred to as “CO”;  Lina Akraim is to be referred to as “CT”.

(b) Pursuant to s. 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, there must be no publication of the identity of the Interested Party, or those of her children, or of any matter likely to lead to the identification of the Interested Party and her children in any report of, or otherwise in connection with, these proceedings.

(c) Pursuant to CPR 5.4C(4):

(i) the parties must within 7 days file a redacted copy of any statement of case filed, omitting the name, address and any other information likely to lead to the identification of the Interested Party and her children

(ii) if any statement of case subsequently filed includes information likely to lead to the identification of the Interested Party and her children, a redacted copy omitting that information must be filed at the same time;

(iii) unless the Court grants permission under CPR 5.4C(6), no non-party many obtain a copy of any unredacted statement of case.

(d) Any person wishing to vary or discharge this Order must make an application, served on each party.

REASONS

  1. Consent Order: The signed draft consent order filed by the parties is approved.
  2. Anonymity: The claim relies on personal information in which the Interested Party and her family have a reasonable expectation of privacy. There are accordingly compelling reasons for the limited derogations from the principle of open justice in paragraph 1.

Signed: DAVID PITTAWAY KC

Date: 12/06/2026