NTA -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order)
Administrative CourtHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order
Claim number: AC-2025-LON-3465
In the High Court of Justice
King’s Bench Division
Administrative Court
In the matter of an application for judicial review
13 October 2025
Before:
The Honourable Mr Justice Swift
Between:
The King
on the application of
NTA
-v-
Secretary of State for Defence
Order
On an application by the Claimant for directions for anonymity and for expedition of the claim
Following consideration of the documents lodged by the Claimant and the Defendant
ORDER by The Honourable Mr Justice Swift
- Pursuant to CPR 39.2(4) and/or the Court’s inherent jurisdiction and/or s. 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998:
(i) the Claimant’s name shall be withheld from the public and must not be disclosed in any proceedings in public; and
(ii) the Claimant is to be referred to orally and in writing as NTA.
- Pursuant to s. 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, there must be no publication of the identity of the Claimant or of any matter likely to lead to the identification of him in any report of, or otherwise in connection with, these proceedings.
3. Pursuant to CPR 5.4C(4):
(iii) the parties must within 7 days file a redacted copy of any statement of case filed, omitting the name, address and any other information likely to lead to the identification of the Claimant;
(iv) if any statement of case subsequently filed includes information likely to lead to the identification of the Claimant, a redacted copy omitting that information must be filed at the same time;
(v) unless the Court grants permission under CPR 5.4C(6), no non- party many obtain a copy of any unredacted statement of case.
- Any person wishing to vary or discharge paragraphs 1 – 3 of this Order must make an application, served on each party.
- Any application by the Defendant pursuant to section 6 of the Justice and Security Act 2013, shall be made by due date for fling and service of the Defendant’s Acknowledgment of Service.
- The Claimant shall file and serve any Reply within 3 days of the day on which the Defendants’ Acknowledgment of Service is served.
- Within 4 days of the Claimant’s compliance with paragraph 6 above, the papers relevant to the application for permission to apply for judicial review, shall be placed before a judge for the consideration of permission. If permission to apply for judicial review is granted, the court shall consider what (if any) further directions to make for the expedition of the determination of the claim.
- Following the due date for filing and service, pursuant to 5 above, the papers in this case shall, as soon as practicable, be referred to a judge for consideration of the application for permission to apply for judicial review. The remainder of the Claimant’s application for expedition shall be considered at that time.
REASONS
- Given the Claimant’s circumstances, as described in the Application Notice filed on 8 October 2025, it is appropriate for him to be anonymised in these proceedings.
- The claim concerns a decision under the ARAP scheme, which is outstanding. The Claimant’s application ought to be considered on its merits, as soon as possible. The Claimant has sought a modest amount of expedition. The Defendant opposed the direction at §5 of the Order on the basis that more time may be needed to decide whether to make a section 6 application. I do not accept that submission. The Defendant will have the usual 3-week period to formulate his defence to the claim; that period ought to be sufficient in this case also to consider whether there is any need to rely on closed material in response to the claim.
- Overall, therefore, I am satisfied that the degree of expedition sought by the Claimant is appropriate and I have made directions accordingly. If permission to apply for judicial review is granted, the court should consider whether to expedite the hearing of the claim and give such further directions as are necessary.
Date: 13 October 2025