RXN and others -v- The United Westminster and Grey Coat Foundation (anonymity order)

High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

Claim Number: KB-2025-003641

In the High Court of Justice
King’s Bench Division

26 November 2025

Before:

Master Eastman

Between:

1. RXN

2. RXC (by his litigation friend RXD)

3. RXL

4. RXD

-v-

The United Westminster and Grey Coat Foundation

Order

UPON consideration of the Claimants’ Article 8 rights to a private and family life

AND UPON reading the Witness Statement of Yogi Amin

AND UPON an anonymity order being granted for prior judicial review proceedings (CO/880/2023) addressing the same issues and involving the same Claimants.

AND UPON IT APPEARING that the case is likely to attract publicity, the proceedings contain highly sensitive information, the second Claimant is a child and the first Claimant was a child at the time that the personal data was shared and so revealing the Claimants’ identities ought to be prohibited

AND PURSUANT TO s11 Contempt of Court Act 1981 and CPR Rule 5.4A to 5.4D and CPR Rule 39.2(4)

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

  1. There be substituted for all purposes of this case, in place of references to the Claimants by name, and whether orally or in writing, reference in the following terms:
    a) First Claimant: RXN
    b) Second Claimant: RXC
    c) Third Claimant: RXL
    d) Fourth Claimant: RXD
  2. To the extent necessary to protect the identity of the Claimants, any other references, whether to persons or places or otherwise, be adjusted appropriately, with permission to the parties to apply in default of agreement as to the manner of such adjustments.
  3. So far as the Claim Form, or any Judgment or Order, or any other document to which anyone might have access to pursuant to CPR Rule 5.4A – D at any time does not comply with the above, the Claimants’ solicitor has leave to file with the Court copies of such document adjusted so as to comply therein. Such copies are to be treated for all purposes as being in substitution for the relevant originals; and the originals are to be retained by the Court in a sealed envelope marked: “not to be opened without the permission of a Judge or Master of the King’s Bench Division”.
  4. A non-party may not inspect or obtain any copy of any document from the court file without permission of a Judge. Any application for such permission must be made on notice to the Claimants (the Court will effect service). Such file is to be retained by the court and marked “PRIVATE”.
  5. A non-party may not obtain any copy statement of case or any other document from the court file unless it has been anonymised in accordance with this direction.
  6. The Court file shall be clearly marked with the words, “An anonymity order was made in this case on 26 November 2025 and any application by a non-party to inspect or obtain a copy document from this file must be dealt with in accordance with the terms of that Order.”
  7. Reporting restrictions apply as to the disclosing of any information that may lead to the subsequent identification of the parties.
  8. Any non-party affected by this order may apply on notice to set aside or vary this order.
  9. Pursuant to the “Practice Guidance: Publication of Privacy and Anonymity Order” issued by the Master of the Rolls dated 16 April 2019, a copy of this Order shall be published on the Judicial Website of the High Court of Justice (www.judiciary.uk). For that purpose, a court officer will send a copy of the order by email to the Judicial Office at judicialwebupdates@judiciary.uk.
  10. Costs in the case.