T7 -v- Home Secretary (anonymity order)

Special Immigration Appeals CommissionAnonymity Order

Case number: SC/006/2025

IN THE SPECIAL IMMIGRATION APPEALS COMMISSION

9 March 2026

Before:

Mrs Justice Steyn DBE

Between:

T7

-v-

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Order

CONTINUED ANONYMITY ORDER FOR PROCEEDINGS COMMENCED ON 18 AUGUST 2025

On the Appellant’s application for an anonymity order pursuant to rule 39(5)(h) of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Procedure) Rules 2003 and for an order restraining publication pursuant to section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 (‘the application)

On the Legal Representatives having been notified of the application on 15 September 2025 by email

On considering the documents consisting of an Explanatory Note, First Witness Statement of Ms Alexandra Rowe dated 28 March 2024, Witness Statement of Daniel Furner dated 15 September 2025 and Legal Submissions (‘the documents’) lodged in accordance with paragraph 28 of the Commission’s Practice Note on Anonymity Orders and Related Measures (‘the Practice Note’)

And on the Commission having handed down judgment on 3 March 2026

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

  1. The Appellant / Applicant, her son and her brother be granted anonymity in relation to the conduct of proceedings in the Commission and be known in these proceedings as T7 and CD and HF respectively;
  2. Nothing may be published which, directly or indirectly, identifies T7 as an Appellant / Applicant in these proceedings before the Commission, and/or is liable to lead to the identification of T7 in connection with these proceedings.
  3. Nothing may be published which, directly or indirectly, identifies CD or HF and/or is liable to lead to the identification of CD or HF in connection with these proceedings.
  4. Nothing may be published which, directly or indirectly, identifies or is otherwise liable to link the identities of T7 and CD and HF to appeal proceedings brought by C11 in respect of a deprivation appeal.
  5. There be liberty to apply on 48 hours’ written notice to the Commission, to the Appellant, to the Secretary of State and to the Legal Representatives (as defined in the Practice Note).
  6. Otherwise, this order is to have effect indefinitely subject to further order of the Commission.