T7 -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity orders)
Case number: SC/006/2025
In the Special Immigration Appeals Commission
In the matter of an appeal pursuant to Section 2 and a review pursuant to
Section 2F of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997
16 October 2025
Between:
T7
(Appellant/Applicant)
-v-
Secretary of State for the Home Department
(Respondent)
Anonymity order for proceedings
commenced on 18 August 2025
On the Appellant’s application for an anonymity order pursuant to rule 39(5)(h) of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Procedure) Rules 2003 and for an order restraining publication pursuant to section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 (‘the application);
On the Legal Representatives having been notified of the application on 15 September 2025 by email;
On considering the documents consisting of an Explanatory Note, First Witness Statement of Ms Alexandra Rowe dated 28 March 2024, Witness Statement of Daniel Furner dated 15 September 2025 and Legal Submissions (‘the documents’) lodged in accordance with paragraph 28 of the Commission’s Practice Note on Anonymity Orders and Related Measures (‘the Practice Note’);
It is ordered that:
- The Appellant / Applicant, her son and her brother be granted anonymity in relation to the conduct of proceedings in the Commission and be known in these proceedings as T7 and CD and HF respectively;
- Nothing may be published which, directly or indirectly, identifies T7 as an Appellant / Applicant in these proceedings before the Commission and/or is liable to lead to the identification of T7 in connection with these proceedings.
- Nothing may be published which, directly or indirectly, identifies CD or HF and/or is liable to lead to the identification of CD or HF in connection with these proceedings.
- Nothing may be published which, directly or indirectly, or is otherwise liable to link the identities of T7 and CD and HF to appeal proceedings brought by C11 in respect of a deprivation appeal.
- There be liberty to apply on 48 hours’ written notice to the Commission, to the Appellant, to the Secretary of State and to the Legal Representatives (as defined in the Practice Note).
- This order continues until the OPEN judgment has been handed down in this appeal, or further order in the meantime, unless the Appellant indicates to the Commission, as soon as the OPEN judgment is circulated in draft, that she intends to apply for it to continue after the OPEN judgment is handed down, and applies to the Commission, before that judgment is handed down, for directions for the determination of any such application.
BY THE COMMISSION
Dated this 16th day of October 2025
Case number: SC/182/2024
In the Special Immigration Appeals Commission
In the matter of an appeal pursuant to Section 2 and a review pursuant to
Section 2F of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997
17 October 2025
Between:
T7
(Appellant/Applicant)
-v-
Secretary of State for the Home Department
(Respondent)
Anonymity order for proceedings
commenced 28 March 2024
On the Appellant’s application for an anonymity order pursuant to rule 39(5)(h) of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Procedure) Rules 2003 and for an order restraining publication pursuant to section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 (‘the application);
On the Legal Representatives having been notified of the application on 28 March 2024 by email;
On considering the documents consisting of an Explanatory Note, First Witness Statement of Ms Alexandra Rowe and Legal Submissions (‘the documents’) lodged in accordance with paragraph 28 of the Commission’s Practice Note on Anonymity Orders and Related Measures (‘the Practice Note’);
It is ordered that:
- The Appellant / Applicant and her son be granted anonymity in relation to the conduct of proceedings in the Commission and be known in these proceedings as T7 and CD respectively;
- Nothing may be published which, directly or indirectly, identifies T7 as an Appellant / Applicant in these proceedings before the Commission and/or is liable to lead to the identification of T7 in connection with these proceedings.
- Nothing may be published which, directly or indirectly, identifies CD and/or is liable to lead to the identification of CD in connection with these proceedings.
- Nothing may be published which, directly or indirectly, or is otherwise liable to link the identities of T7 and CD to appeal proceedings brought by C11 in respect of a deprivation appeal.
- There be liberty to apply on 48 hours’ written notice to the Commission, to the Appellant, to the Secretary of State and to the Legal Representatives (as defined in the Practice Note).
- Otherwise, this order is to have effect indefinitely subject to further order of the Commission.
Dated this 17th day of October 2025