TST and BSB (interested party) -v- London Borough of Barnet (anonymity order)

High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

Claim Number: KB-2023-004214

In The High Court Of Justice
King’s Bench Division

23 November 2023

Before:
Master Eastman

Between:
RSR (A Protected Party, through his Sister and Litigation
Friend, BSB)

TST (A Protected Party, through his Sister and Litigation Friend, BSB)
-v-
London Borough Of Barnet

Anonymity Order

UPON READING an application notice by the Claimants dated 23 October 2023
AND UPON consideration of the Claimants Article 8 right to respect for private and family life and the Article 10 right to freedom of expression.
AND UPON IT APPEARING that non-disclosure of the identity of both Claimants is necessary in order to protect the interests of the Claimants.
AND PURSUANT to rule 39.2(4) of the Civil Procedure Rules and section II of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 and rules 5.4C and 5.4D of the Civil Procedure Rules.

IT IS ORDERED:-

  1. That the identity of the Claimants and Litigation Friend not be disclosed.
  2. That the Claimants be described in all statements of case and other documents to be filed or served in the proceedings and in any judgment or order in the proceedings and in any report of the proceedings by the press or otherwise as “RSR” and “TST” and the Litigation Friend as “BSB”.
  3. That the address of the Claimants be stated in all statements of case and other documents to be filed or served in the proceedings as the address of the Claimants’ solicitors.
  4. That in so far as necessary, any statement of case or other document disclosing the Claimants names or addresses already filed in the proceedings be replaced by a document describing such names or addresses in anonymised form as above.
  5. That the original of any such document disclosing the name or address of the Claimants is to be placed on the Court file in a sealed envelope marked “not to be opened without the permission of a Judge, Master or District Judge of the King’s Bench Division”.
  6. That a non-party may not inspect or obtain a copy of any document on or from the Court file (other than this order duly anonymised as directed) without the permission of a Master or District Judge. Any application for such permission must be made on notice to the Claimants, and the Court will effect service. The file is to be retained by the Court and marked “Anonymised”.
  7. That reporting restrictions apply as to the disclosing of any information that may lead to the subsequent identification of the Claimants. The publication of the name and address of the Claimants or of any member of the Claimants immediate family is prohibited.
  8. That the Claimants do draw and file this Order and serve the same on the Defendant with the Claim Form.
  9. That the Claimants do comply with rule 23.9(2) by service on the Defendants.
  10. That the Defendant may apply under rule 23.10 to have this Order set aside or varied.
  11. That any non-party affected by this Order may apply on notice to all parties to have this Order set aside or varied.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

The order defines the scope of ‘publication’ and makes clear that it is a communication which is “addressed to the public at large or any section of the public”. Set out below is a non- exhaustive list of examples of communications and records which would not constitute publication within the meaning of this order (providing always that proper steps are taken to protect the confidentiality of information from being made public). In this list references to

‘the anonymised party’ include that party’s appointed representatives and advisers, such as solicitor, Litigation Friend, attorney, trustee and deputy.
(i) Communications between the Court Funds Office and the anonymised party in relation to the payment of money into the Court Funds Office for the benefit of the anonymised party or the investment or treatment of payment out of such money.
(ii) Communications between the Court Funds Office, the anonymised party, and any financial institution concerned as to the receipt or investment of such money.
(iii) Records kept by the Court Funds Office, the anonymised party, and any financial institution concerned as to the receipt or investment of the Claimant’s money.
(iv) Retention by all parties to the claim, their representatives, and their advisers of their unredacted files for the purposes of their continuing functions and obligations in relation to the proceedings.
(v) Communications between the Defendant(s), their insurers, or their successors in title and their legal and professional advisers, reinsurers, HM Revenue and Customs (or its successor), the Compensation Recovery Unit or any other person required by law.
(vi) Communications between the anonymised party’s representatives and advisers in managing that party’s affairs.
(vii) Communications for the purpose of obtaining medical care, advice or treatment for the anonymised party.
(viii) Communications by or on behalf of a paying party for the purposes of ascertaining whether the anonymised party is alive, so entitled to continuing periodical payments.