Skip to main content

WXZ -v- Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order)

|High Court|Anonymity Order

Claim No. QB-2021-003020

In the High Court of Justice
Queen’s Bench Division

5 August 2021

 

Before:

Master Cook

Between:

WXZ (a child by his father and litigation friend, TXZ)

-v-

Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust


ORDER

UPON an application by the First and Second Claimants
AND UPON consideration of the First and Second Claimants’ Article 8 right to respect for private and family life and the Article 10 right to freedom of expression.
AND UPON IT APPEARING that non-disclosure of the identity of the First and Second Claimant is necessary in order to protect the interests of the First and Second Claimant and the First’s Claimant Litigation Friend.
AND PURSUANT to rule 39.2(4) of the Civil Procedure Rules and section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 and rules 5.4C and 5.4D of the Civil Procedure Rules.
IT IS ORDERED that
1. That the identity of the First and Second Claimant and the First Claimant’s Litigation Friend not be disclosed.
2. That the First and Second Claimant and the First Claimant’s Litigation Friend be described in all statements of case and other documents to be filed or served in the proceedings and in any judgment or order in the proceedings and in any report of the proceedings by the press or otherwise as the following:
a. First Claimant as “WXZ”
b. Second Claimant as “GXZ”
c. Litigation Friend as “TXZ”
3. That the address of the First and Second Claimant and the First Claimant’s Litigation Friend be stated in all statements of case and other documents to be filed or served in the proceedings as the address of the Claimants’ solicitors.
4. That in so far as necessary, any statement of case or other document disclosing the the First and Second Claimant’s name or address or the name or address of the First Claimant’s Litigation Friend already filed in the proceedings be replaced by a document describing such name or address in anonymised form as above.
5. That the original of any such document disclosing the name or address of the the First and Second Claimant and the First Claimant’s Litigation Friend is to be placed on the Court file and marked confidential and not to be opened without the permission of a Judge, Master or District Judge of the Queen’s Bench Division”.
6. That a non-party may not inspect or obtain a copy of any document on or from the Court file (other than this order duly anonymised as directed) without the permission of a Master or District Judge. Any application for such permission must be made on notice to the Claimants, and the Court will effect service. The Court file shall be clearly marked with the words “An anonymity order was made in this case on 5 August 2021 and any application by a nonparty to inspect or obtain a copy document from this file must be dealt with in accordance with the terms of that Order.”
7. That reporting restrictions apply as to the disclosing of any information that may lead to the subsequent identification of the First and Second Claimant and the First Claimant’s Litigation Friend. The publication of the name and address of the First and Second Claimant’s or of any member of the Claimants’ immediate family or the name and address of the First Claimant’s Litigation Friend is prohibited.
8. The provisions of this Order shall not apply:-
a. to communications between the Court Funds Office and the anonymised party or Litigation Friend in relation to the payment of money into the Court Funds Office for the benefit of the anonymised party or the investment or treatment of payment out of such money;
b. to communications between the Court Funds Office and/or the anonymised party or Litigation Friend and any financial institution concerned as to the receipt or investment of such money; or c. to records kept by the Court Funds Office or the anonymised party or Litigation Friend or any such financial institution in relation to such money.
9. In so far as the Order is made under rule 23.9 without service of a copy of the application notice on the Defendant That the Claimant do comply with rule 23.9(2) by service on the Defendant.
10. That the Defendant may apply under rule 23.10 to have this Order set aside or varied.
11. That any non-party affected by this Order may apply on notice to all parties to have this Order set aside or varied.

Related links

Sign up for alerts

Judgments archive

Judgments published on the judiciary website before 2012 can now be found on The National Archives web archive

Judgment Archive