(1) InterDigital, Inc. (appellant) v Apple Retail UK Limited & ors (respondents) (2) Optis Cellular Technology LLC & ors (respondents) v Apple Retail UK Limited & ors (respondents) (3) Nokia Corporation (appellant) v Optis Cellular Technology LLC & ors (respondents)(4) Google LLC & ors (appellants) v Optis Cellular Technology LLC & ors (respondents)
Wednesday 9 July 2025
(1) By an Appellant’s Notice, filed on 7 August 2024, the Appellant appeal the Order dated 17 June 2024 of Mr Justice Smith sitting as a High Court Judge in the Business and Property Courts, Patents Court in which the Judge held that “per unit” royalty rates are to be published in a lesser redacted version of the FRAND Judgment dated 10 May 2023 and Annex 3 of the FRAND Judgment should not be corrected or redacted.
(2) By an Appellant’s Notice, filed on 6 March 2024 and sealed on 26 April 2024 the Appellant, Interested Party, Qualcom appeals the Order, dated 14 February 2024 of Marcus Smith J, sitting in the Business and Property Courts, Intellectual Property List in which he found that the per unit royalty rates ought to be published.
(3) By an Appellant’s Notice, filed on 7 August 2024, the Appellant appeals the Order dated 17 June 2024 of Mr Justice Smith sitting as a High Court Judge in the Business and Property Courts, Patents Court in which the Judge decided to publish the Less Redacted Trial E Judgement and rejected requests to keep the document redacted.
(4) By an Appellant’s Notice, filed on 7 August 2024, the Appellant appeals the Order dated 17 June 2024 of Mr Justice Smith sitting as a High Court Judge in the Business and Property Courts, Patents Court in which the Judge made Class 1 Corrections to the Trial E Judgment and rejected some redactions in the Trial E Judgement.
View hearing: