Court of Appeal Civil Division live hearings
-
July 26, 2021
The London Borough of Hillingdon –v- The Secretary of State for Transport & ors
Tuesday 20th July 2021 The Applicant/Claimant seeks permission to appeal, with appeal to follow if permission is granted, the Order of Sir D. Ouseley, sitting as High Court Judge, dated 13 April 2021, dismissing the claim for judicial review. The Applicant/Claimant had brought the claim against the decision of the planning inspector dated 28 July 2020 […]
-
July 18, 2021
Lakatamia Shipping Co. Ltd (claimant/resp) –v- Su & ors
Thursday 15th July 2021 The Appellant who was the Defendant in the court below, appeals the order Mr Justice Waksman, sitting as High Court Judge, dated 21 January 2021, by which he dismissed the application made on 7 December 2020 to discharge of an order of Mr Justice Waksman made on 31 January 2020 to restrain […]
-
July 18, 2021
The Secretary of State for the Home Department (def/appellant) –v- Re: EG (claimant/respondent)
Thursday 15th July 2021 The SSHD appeals an Order of Mostyn J of 03 December 2020 by which he allowed EG’s judicial review claim and granted declaratory relief only. The declaration in the Order of 03 December 2020 is that: The SSHD has unlawfully failed to implement her obligations under Article 10(2) of the European Convention […]
-
July 18, 2021
Shanghai Shipyard Co Ltd –v- Reignwood International Investment (Group) Co Ltd
Wednesday 14th July 2021 Claimant’s appeal of the order made by Mr J Robin Knowles QC dated 3 April 2020. Permission to appeal granted by Mr J Knowles QC. Claimant was seeking sums (US$170m said to be due under a guarantee) from Defendant. Judge held, in hearing of preliminary issue as to whether the guarantee liability […]
-
July 18, 2021
The Motherhood Plan & anr –v- Her Majesty’s Treasury & anr
Tuesday 13th July 2021 On 30 April 2020, HM Treasury introduced the Self Employment Income Support Scheme by way of a direction under sections 71 and 76 of the Coronavirus Act 2020. The Scheme provided for payments to those who carried on a business, which business had been adversely affected by the coronavirus emergency. With some […]
-
July 18, 2021
Goodenough & anr –v The Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police
Tuesday 13th July The Claimants appeal paragraph 1 of Turner J’s order dated 17 June 2020 dismissing their claim in battery following his liability judgment dated 26 March 2020 and consequential ancillary judgment dated 8 June 2020. His order allowed their claim for breach of rights under Article 2 ECHR in respect to the Defendant’s […]
-
July 18, 2021
Ralph –v- Ralph
Tuesday 13th July 2021 The Claimant (C) appeals against the order of Morris J dated 14/12/20 dismissing his appeal against the order of HHJ Monty QC dated 6/1/20. The parties are father and son. The C is son of the Defendant (D). The claim was concerned with the beneficial ownership of a residential property. The property […]
-
July 12, 2021
The Rt Rev. Nicholas Baines, Lord Bishop of Leeds & anr (claimant/respondent) –v- Dixon, Coles & Gill (a firm) & ors (def/appellant)
Thursday 8th July 2021 The First Defendant/Appellant, appeals the Order of HHJ Saffman, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, dated 1 December 2020, whereby he ordered that an account be taken of all sums of money possessed or received by the First Defendant as trustee for the Claimants in relation to the disposal by the […]
-
July 12, 2021
Garland & Salaman –v- The Secretary of State or Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
Thursday 8th July 2021 Appeal against the Order of Timothy Mould QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) (10/7/20) that dismissed the claim under para. 12 of Schedule 15 to the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 to quash the Surrey County Council Footpath No. 129 Byfleet, 3 Wisley (Part) and 566 (Wisley) Definitive […]
-
July 12, 2021
Mungur –v- The Secretary of State for the Home Department
Wednesday 7th July 2021 The Applicant appeals the decision of UTJ Gill dated 16 January 2020 refusing the application for permission to apply for judicial review and certifying it as totally without merit (TWM). The Applicants seek to challenge the Respondent’s decision of 20 September 2019 to refuse his application of 30 May 2019 for indefinite […]