Court of Appeal Civil Division live hearings
-
June 25, 2021
Moore (valuation officer) –v- Great Bear Distribution Ltd & Avison Young Ltd –v- Jackson (valuation officer)
Wednesday 23rd – Thursday 24th June 2021 Moore: The valuation officer (VO) appeals, with permission from the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), its decision dated 31 July 2020. The UT dismissed the VO’s appeal from the decision of the Valuation Tribunal for England (VTE) decision dated 7 November 2019 ordering the deletion from the 2010 rating list of […]
-
June 25, 2021
Re: F (a child)
Wednesday 23rd June 2021 Application for permission to appeal with appeal to follow if granted against the order of MacDonald J dated the 28 May 2021. The Applicants are “A’s” parents. They were the Second and Third Respondents to an application made by a NHS Foundation Trust under section 8 of the Children Act 1989 to […]
-
June 25, 2021
Bell & anr (claimant/resp) –v- The Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust (def/appellant)
Wednesday 23rd – Thursday 24th June 2021 This is an appeal against the Order of the President of Queen’s Bench Division, Lewis LJ and Lieven J (1/12/20). The claim for judicial review was of the practice of the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, through its Gender Identity Development Service of prescribing puberty-suppressing drugs to persons under […]
-
June 25, 2021
School Facility Management & ors (claimant/resp) v The Governing Body of Christ the King College (def/appellant) & anor
Tuesday 22nd – Wednesday 23rd June 2021 1st Defendant’s appeal, against part of the Order of Mr Justice Foxton, permission having been granted by his order dated 10 June 2020. Background: In 2009, the Isle of Wight Council (the Council) approved a request by the Governing Body of Christ the King College (the College) to expand its […]
-
June 25, 2021
Re: P (a child)
Tuesday 22nd June 2021 The Applicant mother seeks permission to appeal the order of Ms Clare Ambrose sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge dated 26 March 2021 by which she dismissed the Mother’s application pursuant to the 1980 Hague Convention and ordered that the child be returned to India. The child is 4 years […]
-
June 25, 2021
The Test Claimants in the Royal Mail Group Litigation (claimant/resp) v Royal Mail Ltd (def/appellant)
Tuesday 22nd – Thursday 24th June 2021 The Defendant appeals, with permission to appeal in part from Mann J, only in respect of paragraph 1 of his order dated 23 January 2020 (the main order) in respect to the answers given to Preliminary Issues 5,8 and 14 as set out in that paragraph, following his judgment of […]
-
June 25, 2021
Mariana & Others –v- BHP Group PLC & another
Tuesday 22nd June 2021 Application for permission to re-open a permission to appeal application refused on the papers. If permission to re-open is granted, the permission application may also be dealt with at this hearing. The claim arises from the collapse of a Brazilian dam. In their application to reopen, the Cs submit that when the […]
-
June 21, 2021
Capitol Park Leeds PLC (claimant/respondent) –v- Global Radio Services Ltd (defendant/appellant)
Thursday 17th June 2021 The Appellant/Defendant appeals the Order of Deputy High Court Judge Nolan QC, dated 23 October 2020 in which he declared that the lease dated 4 March 2002 of the property knows as 1 Sterling Court, Topcliffe Lane, Capitol Park in Leeds did not terminate on 12 November 2017, but continues until 11 […]
-
June 21, 2021
Re: I-A (children)
Thursday 17th June 2021 This is an appeal the decision of Peel J, sitting in the High Court – Family Division, dated 18 December 2020. The mother appeals against the refusal to revoke the Placement Order dated 14 June 2019 and the Adoption Order dated 6 April 2020. The case concerns three boys. The mother opposes […]
-
June 21, 2021
Valbonne Estates Ltd (applicant/appellant) –v- Cityvalue Estates Ltd & anr (respondent/respondent)
Thursday 17th June 2021 The applicant, Valbonne Estates Ltd, appeal the order of Bacon J dated 11 March 2021 (amended on 14 March 2021), whereby he discharged the injunction, dismissed the applicant’s application for a re-grant of the injunction, ordered costs against the applicant on the indemnity basis and ordered that the Respondents shall have liberty […]