Benjamin Harrison: Prevention of Future Deaths Report

Alcohol, drug and medication related deathsState Custody related deaths

Skip to related content

Date of report: 19/07/2024 

Ref: 2024-0394 

Deceased name: Benjamin Harrison 

Coroner name: Patricia Harding 

Coroner Area: Mid Kent & Medway 

 
Category: State Custody related deaths | Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths 
 
This report is being sent to: Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust | The Governor HMP Rochester 



REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
OXLEAS NHS FOUNATION TRUST,
THE GOVERNOR HMP ROCHESTER 
1CORONER 
I am Patricia Harding HM senior coroner for Mid Kent and Medway 
2CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and  regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 
3INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 
On 16 May 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Benjamin Noah Frances Harrison. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest listed 3rd June 2024 with a  jury.

The conclusion of the inquest was 
Accident- Benjamin Harrison having inhaled fumes from a [REDACTED] causing his death.   

Central issues which possibly contributed to the death:   
Insufficient healthcare cover at HMP Rochester.   
Omission of the OSG officer to inform the night orderly officer of Mr. Harrison’s appearance  after 21.30 on 9th May 2022.   

Central issues which are relevant to the death but did not cause or contribute to the death:   
Omission to arrange a GP review at HMP Elmley after the chronic pain multi-disciplinary team clinic was cancelled.   
Omission to follow up a referral to the specialist pain team at HMP Elmley.   
Omission to refer Mr. Harrison to the substance misuse team at HMP Elmley.   
Lack of communication regarding the handover of Mr. Harrison from HMP Elmley to HMP  Rochester and between healthcare staff and prison staff at both prisons.   

Inadequate number of prison officers on duty on the wing on the night shift at HMP Rochester Lack of first aid training for OSGs. 

1a [REDACTED] Toxicity   
4CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Benjamin Harrison was released from HMP Elmley in January 2021 and recalled on 19th March 2022.   
He had been prescribed a number of medications in the community for chronic pain which increased the risk of respiratory and central nervous system depression, namely [REDACTED] and a [REDACTED].

Whilst at HMP Elmley consideration was given to reducing the medication but this had not been addressed before he was transferred to HMP Rochester on 5th May 2022. Following his  arrival at HMP Rochester a GP recommended reduction of the opioid medication and the issue was tabled for discussion at a complex case review meeting on 18th May 2022 how best to  effect this.   

[REDACTED] are not recommended for use in prison because of the risks of  tampering and diverting. Mr. Harrison had a history of substance misuse and had previously had his prescription stopped for this reason. 

On the afternoon of 9th May 2022 Mr. Harrison was administered his medications including a new        [REDACTED].  

His cell mate gave evidence that after he returned to his cell Mr. Harrison used a vape pen to heat the [REDACTED] causing the chemicals within to be released which he then inhaled. 
He did this on more than one occasion. 

Around 8.35pm an OSG completed a roll check. She saw Mr Harrison lying on the bed and  was told by his cell mate that he was ok. She formed the impression that he was likely under  the influence of a substance. She did not alert the orderly planning to do welfare checks  instead. 
She returned to the cell around 9.15 to check on Mr. Harrison. She saw him get off his bed  and described his as wobbly/hobbly which he attributed to having hit his leg. She stated he  was coherent. 

The OSG stated that she returned on two or three further occasions and saw him sitting on the edge of his bed talking to his cell mate.   

Around 10pm she asked Mr. Harrison’s cell mate if Mr. Harrison was ok as he was lying on the  bed and she couldn’t see his face. She was told he was asleep and did not make any further  enquiry because she thought he would be better sleeping it off. 

Neither she nor the orderly could remember if they discussed that Mr. Harrison was under the  influence around this time when the orderly came onto the landing. 

At around 11.55pm Mr. Harrison’s cell mate raised the alarm stating he had realised that Mr.  Harrison had not moved for a while. He could not be roused and a code blue was called.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was commenced and continued until shortly after the arrival of  the ambulance when life was declared extinct. 

The jury rejected the evidence of the OSG in relation to her observations of Mr. Harrison being alive and well after 9.30 based on the evidence of the cell mate and the pathological evidence  as to how long Mr. Harrison had likely been dead. 
5CORONER’S CONCERNS 
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my  opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances  it is my statutory duty to report to you. 
  
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.   

(1) Evidence was given by prison staff that it was not uncommon for prisoners to be under the  influence of substances, particularly spice at HMP Rochester.   
During the day when it was suspected that someone was under the influence, healthcare  would attend to assess whether medical attention or monitoring was required there was  however no access to in house health care during the night state.   

OSG officers without medical training or knowledge of the prisoner’s medical history had to 
use their own judgement whether to monitor a prisoner or to escalate the matter.   

The prison orderly was not notified immediately when someone appeared to be under the  influence and that the individual was thought to be under the influence was not documented.  
 
Prison staff did not have any guidance or policy to assist them as to when to escalate matters  or what monitoring should be undertaken and staff did not routinely use the GP on call service  for advice.  
 
(2) Prison staff did not receive a briefing about prisoners with medication in possession in  accordance with PS24/2011 

(3) In evidence there were discrepancies between the policies in place and the understanding  of healthcare staff as to what information could be shared with prison staff and when it should  be shared. 

Some healthcare staff in evidence indicated they would not share information about  medication in any circumstances. 

The healthcare policy and practice of healthcare staff in relation to information sharing does  not align with PSI64/2011 that information can be shared without a prisoner’s consent if it is  considered necessary to protect the individual or anyone else from the risk of death or serious 
harm.   

There was no clear process as to how or where the information would be shared and recorded either where a prisoner had consented to information sharing or where consent had not been  given but it was nevertheless necessary to share the information. 
6ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you Oxleas NHS  Foundation Trust and Governor HMP Rochester have the power to take such action. 
7YOUR RESPONSE 
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 13th September 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the  timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 
88. COPIES and PUBLICATION 
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons 
Family of Mr. Harrison 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He  may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest.  You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the  release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 
919 July 2024                        
Patricia Harding Senior Coroner for Mid Kent and Medway