Carl Eastman: Prevention of Future Deaths Report

Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Skip to related content

Date of report: 17/02/2025 

Ref: 2025-0093 

Deceased name: Carl Eastman 

Coroners name: Ian Potter 

Coroners Area: Inner North London 

Category: Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths 

This report is being sent to: Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust 

Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

The Chief Executive Officer 
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust Anne Bryans House 
77 Fleet Road 
London 
NW3 2QG 
1CORONER

I am Ian Potter, assistant coroner for Inner North London.
2CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and  Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
3INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 1 August 2024, an investigation was commenced into the death of Carl Edmond EASTMAN, aged 96 years at the time of his death.  
The investigation concluded at the end of an inquest heard by me on 17 December 2024 and 5 February 2025 at St Pancras Coroner’s Court. 

The conclusion of the inquest was ‘accident’.

The medical cause of death was: 
1a traumatic right extra-axial haemorrhage
1b anti-coagulation treatment 
1c pulmonary embolus (2018, 2022) 
II   metastatic prostate cancer
4CIRCUMSTANCES OF DEATH

Carl Eastman was admitted to the Royal Free Hospital on 23 July 2024,  following a fall at home, which was subsequently found not to have caused any injury. He was admitted to a ward where, on 25 July 2024, he had an  unwitnessed fall, which did not result in any significant injury. As a result of  this fall, Mr Eastman was transferred to an ‘Enhanced Care Bay’ to reduce  the risk of further falls, where he should have been kept under constant  observation. 

In the early hours of 28 July 2024, Mr Eastman had a second unwitnessed  fall at a time when a member of staff should have accompanied him.  Following this, staff did not follow practices and procedures in place for  patients sustaining falls and there was, at times, a total lack of  communication between staff. Mr Eastman was found to have an irreversible bleed on the brain as a result of his fall on 28 July 2024. Mr Eastman died in  hospital on the evening of 28 July 2024, as a direct result of the injury  sustained in the unwitnessed fall in the ward earlier that day. 
5CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of my investigation and the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concerns. In my opinion, there is a risk that future  deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my  statutory duty to report to you. 

I heard evidence from both a consultant geriatrician and the head of nursing  for the AMEDEC division. I was provided with an action plan from the Trust,  which sets out numerous measures that the Trust has already put in place or plans to put in place. The concerns I am bringing to your attention by way of  this report, relate to matters that do not appear, as yet, to have been  considered by the Trust. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are, as follows:

1.  The consultant geriatrician’s evidence was that CT scan was  requested to take place ‘as soon as possible’ following the first unwitnessed fall on 25 July 2024; however, they accepted that this was not conducted in a timely manner.  

a) Further, following the second unwitnessed fall on 28 July 2024, there  was a further delay in a CT scan taking place. I was told that this scan  should have been conducted within 1-2 hours of the request being  made, yet it took place over three hours after the patient was reviewed by the doctor and the request for the scan was made. 

b) In Mr Eastman’s case, the delays in receiving the scans transpired to  be immaterial in the particular circumstances. However, I am  concerned that if delays in such scans, where traumatic injury is  suspected, are repeated in the future, there is a risk that deaths could occur. 

2.  There was evidence of what I considered to be ‘widespread  communication issues’ in the care provided to Mr Eastman. These included: 
When the on-call doctor attended to review Mr Eastman at approximately 02:45 on 28 July 2024, ward staff (incorrectly)  told the doctor that nobody had fallen on the ward, which lead to the doctor leaving the ward without Mr Eastman having been reviewed. As the consultant geriatrician said in his evidence,  communication between the ward staff and medical staff was not good. 
The evidence revealed that there were deficiencies in basic 
record keeping. 

3.  As set out above, there was clear evidence that the Trust has put  extensive measures in place to address the issue of staff having not followed the Trust’s own post-fall procedures and protocols. However, I am concerned that the issue may not be limited to just those particular  protocols and may be indicative of a wider skills/knowledge deficit.  

4.  Following on from the matter set out in paragraph 3 above, the  evidence revealed a lack of professional curiosity on the part of some staff members (nursing and medical). In my view, this could also be  indicative of an underlying skills/knowledge deficit. 
6ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe that you have the power to take such action. 
7YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 14 April 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no  action is proposed. 
8COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of this report to the Chief Coroner and to the following persons: 

Mr Eastman’s family; and 
The Care Quality Commission.

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted  summary form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who she believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the  publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 
9Ian Potter 
HM Assistant Coroner, Inner North London
17 February 2025