Mazeedat Adeoye: Prevention of Future Deaths Report

Child Death (from 2015)

Skip to related content

Date of report: 05/12/2024  

Ref: 2024-0671 

Deceased name: Mazeedat Adeoye 

Coroners name: Graeme Irvine 

Coroners Area: East London 

Category: Child Death (from 2015) 

This report is being sent to: National Police Air Service | London Borough of Newham | Department of Health and Social Care | Social Work England 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. [REDACTED], Head of National Police Air Service.
Sent via email: [REDACTED]

2. [REDACTED], Chief Executive Officer and [REDACTED], Director of Social Care,
The London Borough of Newham     
Sent via email: [REDACTED]
  
3. [REDACTED], Secretary of State for Health & Social Care
Sent via Email: [REDACTED]

4. [REDACTED], Chair of the Board, Social Work England
Sent via email: [REDACTED]
1CORONER

I am Graeme Irvine, senior coroner, for the coroner area of East London
2CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.  http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7  http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 
3INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 30th January 2022, this Court commenced an investigation into the death of  Mazeedat Opeyemi Adeoye, aged 2-years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 29th November 2024. The court returned a narrative conclusion.

Mazeedat Adeoye, a two-year-old girl died on 29/1/22 in the rear garden of domestic premises in Dagenham, East London. 

Whilst playing alone and inadequately supervised in the garden, Mazeedat fell head first into a plastic refuse bin that contained water. Despite the level of water in the bin being no more than 9cms in depth, Mazeedat drowned. 

At the time of her death, Mazeedat had been entrusted into the care of an acquaintance of her mother. Mazeedat’s mother had allowed her daughter to be cared for in these circumstances as a matter of last resort. Despite significant efforts, Mazeedat’s mother had been unable to secure state assistance for childcare. 

Mazeedat’s mother could not care for her daughter on 29/1/22, as she was required to attend hospital with her baby who had undergone heart surgery. Mazeedat was not permitted to accompany her mother into the hospital ward. Mazeedat’s mother was a single parent without family or friends to rely upon for support. 

Local  authority  child  services  failed  to  support  Mazeedat’s  family  and  put  in  place appropriate support for Mazeedat’s care at this time. 

By virtue of her age and the fact that Mazeedat was assessed to be a child in need under s.17 Children’s Act 1989 she was obviously in a dependent position and could not maintain her safety herself. 
The combined failures of the local authority and those caring for Mazeedat on 29th January 2022 taken cumulatively, constitute a gross failure. Those aggregated failures, on the balance of probability more than minimally contributed to Mazeedat’s death. 

There was a missed opportunity to provide effective care in the form of an offer of a temporary fostering placement which would have probably resulted in the avoidance of Mazeedat’s death. 

Mazeedat’s medical cause of death was determined as;
1.a. Drowning
4CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Mazeedat Adeoye was a 2-year-old girl who was born in Nigeria. Mazeedat’s mother  brought her to the UK in the spring of 2021 under a visitor visa, the family overstayed in the UK, lacking resources to return to the UK. 

Mazeedat’s mother was pregnant when she came to the UK. In September 2021 Mrs  Adeoye was referred to Newham social services,” no recourse to public funds” team  (“NRPF”) by an NHS ante-natal care. health visitor. Mazeedat was eventually assessed in mid-October to be a “child in need”, at risk of harm and destitution, pursuant to s.17  The Children Act 1989. The family were provided accommodation and subsistence  payments. 

Mrs Adeoye sought temporary foster care for Mazeedat on three occasions when she  was temporarily unable to care for her daughter. In October 2021, a request was made  when Mrs Adeoye was scheduled to give birth. A second request was made in  November 2021 when Mazeedat’s baby brother was admitted to hospital for emergency inpatient care. The final request was made on 21st January 2022, when Mrs Adeoye’s  infant son was required to undergo emergency heart surgery.  

In all 3 instances, Newham child services failed to facilitate an agreement with Mrs  Adeoye to provide temporary foster care. Instead, on each occasion, Mrs Adeoye was asked to find a care solution herself, despite her consistent assertion that she had no family or support network.

The result of social service’s abrogation of their statutory duties was that Mazeedat was  placed at risk of harm whilst, respectively, being cared for by midwives on a labour ward, living on a children’s ward and finally, being cared for by an unproven volunteer.  

On 29th January 2022, whilst playing alone and unsupervised in the rear garden of the  home of the volunteer carer, Mazeedat fell into a plastic refuse bin containing water and drowned.  
5CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the  circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –

National Police Air Service

1. NPAS helicopter resources were utilised in the search for Mazeedat on 29th January 2022. At 16.40, a small circular heat signature was observed by a tactical flight officer within the garden where Mazeedat’s body was ultimately located.  The  shape  and  size  of  the  object  meant  that  the  object  was “discounted” in the search and its presence was not communicated to anyone. Mazeedat was discovered 11 minutes later by a police dog unit on the ground. Whereas the delay in locating Mazeedat did not contribute to her tragic death, the decision to discount such a heat signature could, in another case, amount to a risk of fatal harm. 

London Borough of Newham

2. The Adeoye family interactions with the local authority, child services team were characterised  by  unprofessional  behaviour  from  social  workers.  A  culture existed  within  the  team  that  tolerated  and  therefore  encouraged  overtly antagonistic   behaviour   towards   vulnerable   people.   Should   this   hostile environment continue to be enabled, sub-optimal care outcomes will result with an ongoing risk of fatal harm. 

3. The NRPF team was poorly managed. Social workers were not adequately supervised, and their caseloads were not periodically reviewed. The absence of leadership allowed a gradual erosion of empathy for the very people the team were   employed   to   support.   The   absence   of   proper   management   left inappropriate behaviour unconstrained and allowed irrational decisions made arbitrarily by junior staff, to stand unchecked. 

4. Inadequate  standards  of  note-keeping  meant  that  the  rationale  for  critical decisions made by the NRPF were not properly recorded. The absence of clear records diminished both communication within the team and accountability. 
6ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action.  
7YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 31st January 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 
8COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons the family of Mazeedat, to the Child Death Overview Panel (where the  deceased was under 18)]. I have also sent it to the local Director of Public Health. 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.    
I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it useful or of interest.  
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary  form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest.  
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response. 
9[DATE] 05/12/2024
[SIGNED BY CORONER]