Neil Clarke: Prevention of Future Deaths Report

Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Skip to related content

Date of report: 02/07/2025 

Ref: 2025-0332 

Deceased name: Neil Clarke 

Coroners name: Christopher Murray 

Coroners Area: Manchester South 

Category: Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths 

This report is being sent to: Department of Health and Social Care | NHS England | Stepping Hill Hospital

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

The Secretary of State for Health
NHS England 
Stepping Hill Hospital 
1CORONER 

Christopher Murray 
HM Assistant Coroner 
Manchester South Coronial Area
Mount Tabor 
Stockport 
2CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, paragraph 7,  Schedule 5, and The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, regulations 28 and 29.   
3INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 1st March 2024 an investigation was opened into the death of Neil John  Clarke aged 81 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on  1st May 2025. Sitting without a jury I made a determination that Neil John Clark died as a result of hypoxic encephalopathy, aspiration pneumonia and  infarcted bowel arising as a consequence of aspiration secondary to vomiting  which precipitated a cardiac arrest following a right hemicolectomy. 
4CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Neil Clarke was a fit 81 year old who was investigated by way of colonoscopy  following reports of bowel discomfort. A colonoscopy and polypectomy were  carried out on 12th December 2022. Two polyps were removed and were benign. A repeat colonoscopy on 29th August 2023 showed recurrence of a  polyp in the caecum. Endoscopic mucosal resection polypectomy failed. A  discussion in MDT took place and the consensus was to proceed with a right  hemicolectomy. The options provided to Mr Clarke were conservative  management, further polypectomy or a right hemicolectomy. The latter was  advised as the most appropriate option by clinicians as it would involve one  invasive procedure rather than two and provide clarity as to the nature of the polyps being cancerous or benign. The surgery carried out on 12th February  2024 at Stepping Hill Hospital was uneventful save for some post operative  bleeding. Once stabilised he was transferred to ward D5 on 15th February 2024.  He felt unwell that afternoon and vomited. His ward lights were turned out at  23:00 and he was made comfortable. At 02:00 on 16th February he was agitated and then violently vomited before suffering a cardiac arrest. CPR was  administered and he was taken to the intensive care unit where he was treated  and monitored. Sadly, he had suffered a hypoxic encephalopathy following  aspiration secondary to vomiting. He went on to develop aspiration pneumonia  and an infarcted bowel which in conjunction with his hypoxic encephalopathy  resulted in his death at Stepping Hill Hospital on 26th February 2024. 
5CORONER’S CONCERNS

The evidence heard during the inquest into Neil John Clarke’s death and the  findings confirmed there were a number of factors contributing to Neil’s death  which are of concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances, it is my statutory duty to report to  you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows –

The considerations given to the appropriateness, from a safety and well-being perspective, of surgical procedures involving elderly patients who may benefit from more conservative measures and the associated documentation and guidance advising patients of different treatment choices.  
My second concern arising from this interest was the accuracy of hand over  communications between clinical staff in respect of patients returning to the  main ward from HDU. 
6ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe that you and/or your organisation have the power to take such action.   
7YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 27th August 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period.   Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken,  setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action  is proposed.   
8COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the following

Neil’s family. 
Care Quality Commission 
HHJ Alexia Durran, the Chief Coroner of England & Wales

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or  summary form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who she believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the  publication of your response.   
9DATE
2nd July 2025
Signed CSMurray
HM Assistant Coroner