High Court

Further links: National Archives Case Law Broadcast Sentencing Remarks Anonymity Order Committal for Contempt of Court Privacy Order

• September 11, 2025

  MAJ -v- The Intrinsic Care Group Limited and another (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• September 11, 2025

  MT -v- CF and Covea Insurance (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• September 11, 2025

  Peter Coady -v- Gerard Coady

  Business and Property CourtsHigh CourtJudgment

• September 11, 2025

  AD and another -v- London Borough of Redbridge (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• September 11, 2025

  TRL -v- ACD and Aviva Insurance (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• September 11, 2025

  PXA -v- Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• September 10, 2025

  CIT -v- Financial Conduct Authority (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• September 10, 2025

  CHO -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• September 10, 2025

  CRD -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• September 10, 2025

  TAT -v- Able Transfer Limited (t/a Northern Freight Services) (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

The details given in a judgment about the facts of a case may sometimes constitute distressing content (particularly in criminal cases, or cases involving children).