King's Bench Division

Further links: National Archives Case Law Broadcast Sentencing Remarks Anonymity Order Committal for Contempt of Court Privacy Order

• October 7, 2025

  AMD -v- The London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• October 7, 2025

  QMK -v- Barts Health NHS Trust (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• October 7, 2025

  NYR -v- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• October 7, 2025

  COM -v- London Borough of Barnet (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• October 7, 2025

  HZM -v- Nafisa Bi and Advantage Insurance (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• October 7, 2025

  TWX -v- Birmingham City Council (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• October 7, 2025

  RTC -v- Toby Wallace (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• October 7, 2025

  CRR and COY -v- Kent County Council (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• October 6, 2025

  VDR -v- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• October 6, 2025

  EVP -v- Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

The details given in a judgment about the facts of a case may sometimes constitute distressing content (particularly in criminal cases, or cases involving children).