King's Bench Division

Further links: National Archives Case Law Broadcast Sentencing Remarks Anonymity Order Committal for Contempt of Court Privacy Order

• January 9, 2025

  CXD -v- Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• January 8, 2025

  GIH -v- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• January 8, 2025

  COR -v- Ruskin Private Hire Limited (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• January 8, 2025

  AGT -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtCivilHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• January 8, 2025

  HHM -v- Derby City Council (anonymity order)

  CivilHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• January 7, 2025

  OBH -v- Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust and another (anonymity order)

  CivilHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• January 7, 2025

  LAQ -v- Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order)

  CivilHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• January 3, 2025

  CXP -v- Mahmud Makda, Hilton Beds Ltd and Aviva (anonymity order)

  CivilHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• January 3, 2025

  RLP -v- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order)

  CivilHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• January 3, 2025

  TXX -v- DLL, National Farmers’ Union Mutual Insurance and others (anonymity order)

  CivilHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

The details given in a judgment about the facts of a case may sometimes constitute distressing content (particularly in criminal cases, or cases involving children).