The Court of Appeal (Civil Division) – Live streaming of court hearings

How and why are court cases being streamed online?

Most cases from the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) are live-streamed on the judiciary’s YouTube channel.
Live-streaming of selected cases began in 2019 to improve public access to, and understanding of, the work of the courts. We are working towards making it possible for all appropriate cases to be live streamed.

The Court of Appeal (Civil Division) is currently operating a pilot scheme to allow access to the parties’ skeleton arguments, on a limited number of selected cases that are being live streamed.  Please note that the only documents available are those attached on this page. Although you are welcome to view these documents, the re-use, re-editing or redistribution of these documents is not permitted.  You should be aware that any such use could attract liability for breach of copyright or defamation. Authorisation to reproduce material from these documents must be obtained from the copyright holders concerned.

The Court would welcome your feedback on the pilot scheme. If you wish to share any, please complete this feedback form.

View previous cases on the Court of Appeal video archive page. 

Monday 15 June 2026

Ammori (Claimant/Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant/Defendant) (external link)

This live stream is for the Judgment of the appeal heard on 28and 29 April 2026.

By an Appellant’s Notice filed on 6 March 2026 and sealed on 13 March 2026 the Appellant appealed a decision of the High Court, dated 13 February 2026.

The Claimant was co‑founder of Palestine Action, and sought judicial review of the Defendant’s decision of 20 June 2025 to proscribe Palestine Action under Schedule 2 to the Terrorism Act 2000. The High Court allowed the Claimant’s claim for judicial review and quashed the Defendant’s decision to proscribe Palestine Action.

Lower Court Judgment

Appellant’s Skeleton Argument

Appellant’s Supplementary Skeleton Argument

Respondent’s Skeleton Argument

Respondent’s Reply to Supplementary Skeleton Argument

Monday 15 June 2026

Carl v Hawkins & Ors (external link)

By Appellant’s Notice filed on 28 May the 9th Defendant appeals paragraph 11 of an order dated 7 May 2025, (amended on 19 September 2025) disallowing his costs.

The dispute involved ownership of a vintage motorcar and the alleged misappropriation of eight cars by 13 defendants. Although the 9th Defendant avoided liability in the main action, the Judge denied him costs due to deliberate non-disclosure and non-cooperation. At the consequentials hearing, the 9th Defendant sought costs against the Claimant for failing to follow the pre-action protocol. However, the Judge held that proceeding without one was reasonable and proportionate.

Court 4

Court 63

Court 67

Court 68

Court 69

Court 70

Court 71

Court 72

Court 73

Court 74

Court 75

Court 1 Rolls Building

Court 17 Rolls Building

External links

UK Judiciary YouTube Channel (external link)