High Court

Further links: National Archives Case Law Broadcast Sentencing Remarks Anonymity Order Committal for Contempt of Court Privacy Order

• August 1, 2025

  Chief Constable of Surrey Police -v- Surrey Magistrates’ Court (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• August 1, 2025

  LTT -v- The Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• August 1, 2025

  BZZ -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• August 1, 2025

  BUU1 -v- Secretary of State for Defence (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• August 1, 2025

  STR -v- Joseph Colbert (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• August 1, 2025

  Teledyne -v- Gao and others

  CivilHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionJudgment

• August 1, 2025

  ModernaTX -v- Pfizer and others

  Business and Property CourtsChancery DivisionCourt of Appeal Civil DivisionHigh CourtIntellectual Property ListPatents CourtJudgment

• August 1, 2025

  Committal for contempt of court: Klotho Brands -v- Stanford

  Business and Property CourtsBusiness ListHigh CourtCommittal for Contempt of Court

• August 1, 2025

  Caxton International and others -v- Essity Aktiebolag and another

  Business and Property CourtsFinancial ListHigh CourtJudgment

• August 1, 2025

  Ronnan and another -v- Stansfield and another

  Business and Property CourtsChancery DivisionHigh CourtJudgment

The details given in a judgment about the facts of a case may sometimes constitute distressing content (particularly in criminal cases, or cases involving children).