King's Bench Division

Further links: National Archives Case Law Broadcast Sentencing Remarks Anonymity Order Committal for Contempt of Court Privacy Order

• February 4, 2025

  KMT -v- Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order)

  CivilHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• February 4, 2025

  MOX -v- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order)

  CivilHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• February 4, 2025

  APD -v- The Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtCivilHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• February 4, 2025

  MTP -v- LTD and Advantage Insurance (anonymity order)

  CivilHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• February 4, 2025

  WMX -v- DMX and Advantage Insurance (anonymity order)

  CivilHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• February 4, 2025

  RF -v- The Government of the United States of America (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• February 3, 2025

  SNH -v- Keith Bennett T/A KB Plastering (anonymity order)

  CivilHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• February 3, 2025

  ABY -v- Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• February 3, 2025

  JHX -v- East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• January 31, 2025

  BVT -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

The details given in a judgment about the facts of a case may sometimes constitute distressing content (particularly in criminal cases, or cases involving children).