Queen's Bench Division

Further links: National Archives Case Law Broadcast Sentencing Remarks Anonymity Order Committal for Contempt of Court Privacy Order

• July 19, 2022

  DA -v- Bristol City Council (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtQueen's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• July 19, 2022

  BEA and another -v- Motor Insurers’ Bureau (anonymity order)

  Queen's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• July 18, 2022

  LRE -v- University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust (anonymity order)

  Queen's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• July 18, 2022

  PJS -v- Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order)

  Queen's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• July 18, 2022

  AXD & Ors -v- The Welsh Ministers (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtQueen's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• July 18, 2022

  AB -v- Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole Council (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtQueen's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• July 18, 2022

  R -v- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtHigh CourtQueen's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• July 15, 2022

  CAB -v- Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust (anonymity order)

  Queen's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• July 14, 2022

  Daedone -v- The British Broadcasting Corporation (anonymity order)

  Media and Communications ListQueen's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• July 13, 2022

  OHU -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtQueen's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

The details given in a judgment about the facts of a case may sometimes constitute distressing content (particularly in criminal cases, or cases involving children).