High Court

• September 18, 2025

  Practice Statement from the Chancellor of the High Court: Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006

  Read the updated Practice Statement issued by Sir Julian Flaux in respect of Schemes of Arrangement and Restructuring Plans under the Act

  Chancellor of the High CourtHigh CourtSir Julian FlauxPractice Guidance

• September 18, 2025

  AXA -v- Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• September 18, 2025

  ABC -v- East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• September 18, 2025

  SQN -v- East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• September 18, 2025

  CVM -v- Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• September 18, 2025

  CXB -v- PXB (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• September 18, 2025

  XVA -v- AYX and Motor Insurers Bureau (anonymity order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• September 18, 2025

  SAW -v- DXN and Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance (withholding and reporting restrictions order)

  High CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• September 18, 2025

  CTT -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

• September 17, 2025

  CIN -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department (anonymity order)

  Administrative CourtHigh CourtKing's Bench DivisionAnonymity Order

The details given in a judgment about the facts of a case may sometimes constitute distressing content (particularly in criminal cases, or cases involving children).