Court of Appeal Civil Division live hearings
-
March 4, 2022
Elkundi & ors (claimant/respondent) v Birmingham City Council (defendant/appellant)
Tuesday 1 – Thursday 3 March 2022 Elkundi & ors (claimant/respondent) v Birmingham City Council (defendant/appellant) Imam (claimant/appellant) v London Borough of Croydon (defendant/respondent) Elkundi – The Defendant, Birmingham City Council (‘BCC’) appeals the Order of Mrs Justice Steyn dated 23 April 2021. 2. Brief factual background : The four claimants each applied to BCC […]
-
February 25, 2022
Re: D-C (a child)
Thursday 24 February 2022 The child’s mother appeals the decision, handed down on 3 December 2021, to refuse her appeal against the order registering the judgment of the Court of Appeal, St Denis, La Réunion dated 21 October 2020 made by District Judge Alun Jenkins on 6 July 2021, to refuse her application for orders […]
-
February 25, 2022
Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (appellant) -v- Perfect (respondent)
Wednesday 23 February 2022 This is a second appeal. HMRC appeal the decision of Upper Tribunal Judges Mrs Justice Philippa Whipple and Judge Ashley Greenbank dated 8 December 2017. The UT dismissed HMRC’s appeal against a decision of the FTT, allowing the appeals of the Respondent, Mr Perfect, in respect to an assessment of excise […]
-
February 25, 2022
Soteria Insurance Ltd (formerly CIS General Insurance Ltd) (claimant/appellant) v IBM United Kingdom Ltd (respondent)
Wednesday 23 – Thursday 24 February 2022 The Claimant appeals against the order made by O’Farrell J dated 15/4/21 following a handed down judgment of 19/2/21. The judge held that D had repudiated the contract between the parties but dismissed C’s claim to recover the expenditure it wasted by reason of that repudiation which it […]
-
February 25, 2022
CAM Legal services Ltd (defendant/appellant) -v- Belsner (claimant/respondent)
Tuesday 22 February at 1.30pm – Wednesday 23 February 2022 The Appellant (Cam Legal Services), who was the Defendant in the court below, appeals the Order of Mr Justice Lavender, dated 16 October 2020, allowing the appeal of Respondent (Belsner), who was the Appellant below, from the Order on costs of DJ Bellamy, dated 14 […]
-
February 21, 2022
Solicitors Regulation Authority (claimant/respondent) -v- Khan (defendant/appellant) & ors
Thursday 17 February 2022 Solicitors Regulation Authority (claimant/respondent) -v- Khan (defendant/appellant) & ors This is a committal appeal. The appellant, Soophia Khan, appeals the order of Leech J dated 12 January 2022, whereby he ordered that she be committed to prison for six months for two contempts (to run concurrently) with a fixed term of […]
-
February 21, 2022
Counsel General for Wales -v- Secretary of State for Business
Wednesday 16 February 2022 at 10.00am Hearing in respect of breach of hand-down Judgment embargo. View hearing View Judgment
-
February 11, 2022
Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (appellant) v Atholl House Productions Ltd (respondent)
Wednesday 9 – Thursday 10 February 2022 This is a second appeal. The appellant, HMRC, appeals with the permission of Upper Tribunal Judges Mr Justice Marcus Smith and Judge Jonathan Richards, their decision of 18 February 2021, whereby they dismissed HMRC’s appeal. The respondent company is the personal service company (`the Company’) of Kaye Adams, […]
-
February 11, 2022
Asertis Ltd -v- Clarkson & ors
Wednesday 9 February 2022 Appeal 1 – The Claimant/Part 20 Defendant, Asertis Ltd, appeals the order of HHJ Hodge, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, dated 10 February 2021, whereby he granted their summary judgment/strike out application in certain respects, but otherwise dismissed it, and reserved the costs of their application to the trial […]
-
February 11, 2022
Alberti (applicant/respondent) -v- Cadogan Holdings Ltd (respondent/appellant)
Tuesday 8 February 2022 The Appellant Cadogan Holdings Limited appeal the order of Deputy Chamber President Martin Roger QC dated 9 April 2021 by which he determined by way of preliminary issue that section 9(1A)(d) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 does require the Tribunal to assume that it would have been unlawful as a […]